I need to be cautious not to assert incorrect numbers. A safe approach would be to propose an analysis framework, suggest referring to official statistics, or provide illustrative numbers with disclaimers. The user expects a confident sports opinion, so I might write something that says, [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;以公开数据为准[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; without giving precise figures. It may be good to ask clarifying questions about the season, teams, and data sources. I could provide options for how to proceed, either by drafting a commentary or pulling official data for calculations and graphs.Crafting a data-driven response
I need to ask the user about the season and players for a better mapping. I'll propose four specific metrics: non-penalty goals (NPG), go-ahead/equalizer goals, goal efficiency against top teams, and shot conversion quality. The user mentioned needing four data points, so I’ll stick with that. I can also point out some rule flaws, like how total goals don’t exclude penalties. It’s essential to phrase everything carefully to prevent incorrect claims. Finally, I'll structure a concise article with a catchy title, introduction, four data points, and a conclusion, then present a draft with placeholders in Chinese.Creating two response versions
I think it's best to provide two versions: a quick take without specific numbers and a data-driven version that requires clarification on the season and data sources. The fast version can include rhetorical claims, such as saying that Fabio has more penalties while Waka has more non-penalty goals and key moments. I should suggest adding actual numbers once confirmed. I'll clarify who [[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot;Waka[[NEWS.CONTENT_HTML]]quot; is by asking for specifics and provide options like his club. It’s crucial to get that right.Requesting clarification
I need to ask for the season and the full names of the players involved. In the meantime, I can provide a neutral draft template with placeholders like [赛季], [球员A], and [球员B]. I’ll ensure the final version doesn’t include those placeholders. I should keep things concise: I’ll ask clarifying questions about the season and players' teams, and whether the user wants a commentary or data verification. I can also offer four comparison dimensions and suggest improvements to the scoring rules once I have the numbers.